Arts — Noozify Original — September 23, 2026

The Benin Bronzes the British Museum Can't Give Back

By Adam Canissario

Watch the story in half a minute

On September 22nd, the Metropolitan Museum of Art announced that three Nigerian masterpieces will go on display in its renovated Michael C. Rockefeller Wing on a 25-year loan that can be extended. Nobody claims the works were stolen, but the Met judged their ownership history not quite strong enough to add them to its own collection. So the collector who owned them signed them over to Nigeria's National Commission for Museums and Monuments, and Nigeria lent them to the Met.

In Mexico City, meanwhile, the Azcatitlan Codex, a painted history of the Mexica migration, is on display for the first time since it left Mexico in 1840. It stays through December 6th, on loan from the National Library of France under an exchange the two countries' presidents negotiated that sends Mexico's Boturini Codex to Paris in return.

Both cases show that who owns an object and who displays it do not have to be the same. A library can lend a manuscript back to the country it came from, and a collection can change owners while the pieces stay on the same wall. At the British Museum, however, the situation is far more restrictive. It holds more Benin objects than any institution in the world, and British law prevents it from doing what other museums have already done.

The collection was taken from Benin City in 1897. On January 4th of that year, a British party led by acting consul-general James Phillips was ambushed on the road to the Oba's capital and mostly killed. Britain answered with roughly 1,200 marines, sailors, and protectorate troops under Rear Admiral Harry Rawson. Benin City fell on February 18th, the royal palace burned three days later, and Oba Ovonramwen was exiled to Calabar.

Roughly 2,500 objects left the palace with the soldiers. The Admiralty began auctioning its share that May to cover the cost of the expedition, and within months the loot was being bought and sold like any other goods. The name "Benin Bronzes" is itself somewhat misleading. Many of the best-known pieces are brass rather than bronze, cast plaques and commemorative heads that recorded the royal court's history from the sixteenth century onward, and the haul also included carved ivory and wooden works.

A research project called Digital Benin has traced where the objects went. Its database lists 5,314 objects in 139 institutions across 21 countries. The British Museum holds 944, more than anyone. Chicago's Field Museum has 393, Dresden 284, and Oxford's Pitt Rivers Museum 148. The Oba's palace and Nigeria's national museum commission together hold 1,596, a number that has grown quickly while the British Museum has returned none.

The main obstacle is not the museum's reluctance. It is the law.

Section 3(4) of the British Museum Act 1963 bars the trustees from selling, swapping, or giving away anything in the collection except in the narrow cases its Section 5 allows, which are duplicates, some post-1850 printed material that exists in photographic copies, and objects judged "unfit to be retained". A work seized during a military assault on a foreign ruler does not fit any of those categories, and a sixteenth-century Benin plaque is plainly not unfit for anything. The Victoria and Albert Museum is bound by a similar rule in the National Heritage Act 1983, and a 1992 law lets national museums transfer objects only to one another.

The rule has been tested in a case where the moral argument could hardly have been stronger, and it held. In 2005, the British Museum's trustees asked the High Court for permission to return four Old Master drawings that the Gestapo had seized from the Brno lawyer Arthur Feldmann on March 15, 1939, and that the museum had bought in good faith after the war. The trustees openly acknowledged that they believed they had a moral responsibility to return them. Sir Andrew Morritt, then Vice-Chancellor of the High Court, ruled that it made no difference. "No moral obligation can justify a disposition by the Trustees of an object forming part of the collections of the Museum," he wrote. The trustees still needed legal permission to give the works away, and none existed. Only Parliament could supply it.

Parliament then did, but only for one kind of case. The Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) Act 2009 lets national museums return art looted in the Nazi era when an independent panel recommends it, and a 2019 amendment removed the law's ten-year expiry. That is the pattern. Where the 1963 Act blocks a return, Parliament has to carve out an exception, and so far it has carved out exactly one, for one category of victim, rather than any general power to return objects that could cover the Benin collection.

A wider opening nearly happened by accident. The Charities Act 2022 included two sections, 15 and 16, allowing charity trustees to make "ex gratia" transfers, meaning gifts a trustee makes because they feel morally bound to rather than because the law requires it. The provisions raised an unexpected problem, because Britain's national museums are charities as well, and once the implications became clear, the government put the change on hold. In a January 2024 letter to the Charity Commission, heritage minister Lord Parkinson said the consequences "were not made clear by the Law Commission" and confirmed that the national museums would stay bound by laws "precluding them from resolving to restitute objects." When the sections finally took effect on November 27, 2025, 16 national institutions were excluded, the British Museum among them. So the new power to return objects on moral grounds reached every charity except the museums holding the collections people actually fight over.

That is why the returns of the past four years have come from everywhere but the British Museum. Berlin's Ethnological Museum handed 512 Benin objects to Nigeria on August 25, 2022, with about a third staying in Germany on a ten-year loan. The Smithsonian's National Museum of African Art returned 29 that October under an ethical-returns policy its board had adopted earlier that year, and nine later came back on loan. Cambridge, a charity rather than a national museum bound by statute, handed ownership of 116 objects to Nigeria on February 8, 2026 with the Charity Commission's approval, keeping 17 on a three-year loan. Three Swiss museums handed over 18 pieces in Lagos on June 29, 2026, the first of 28 that Switzerland agreed to give up that March. Oxford's Pitt Rivers Museum, also a charity, has been waiting since 2022 for approval to return 97 objects, and Digital Benin does not yet list any of its holdings as returned. Each had a legal route that the British Museum does not.

There is another complication on the Nigerian side, which is disagreement over who should control the returned objects. On March 28, 2023, the outgoing Buhari government issued an official notice making every returned Benin object, including future returns, the private property of Oba Ewuare II "to the exclusion of any other person or persons and or institutions." That upended the Museum of West African Art, a David Adjaye-designed institution in Benin City that had been pitched to German and other donors as the bronzes' future home. The museum had already widened its mission, dropping "Edo" from its name as it grew into a broader contemporary-art project. On November 9, 2025, supporters of the Oba disrupted a preview event, forcing the opening to be postponed indefinitely. In August, a state committee chaired by Adams Oshiomhole recommended renaming it the Benin Royal Museum of Africa Art and handing it to the palace. The national museum commission and the Oba had reached a working arrangement in early 2025 under which the commission displays and cares for what the king owns, and the Cambridge and Swiss returns have gone to it on that basis.

All of this gives British Museum trustees reasons to be cautious about the practical side of any return. None of it explains why the museum itself cannot return the objects. The ban would stand even if Benin City had a finished museum waiting with an empty plinth.

What the 1963 Act leaves the museum is the loan, much like the arrangement that has brought the Azcatitlan Codex to Mexico City. Loans have a catch: the borrower must acknowledge the lender's ownership, and ownership is the whole dispute. Nigeria has agreed to lend objects back to Berlin, Washington, and Cambridge, and has just lent three to the Met, because in each case it already owned them and the loan was its to give. As with other disputed cultural property, what gives objects like these their value is recognized ownership rather than physical possession, which is why a country can live with an object staying abroad once everyone agrees whose it is.

The British Museum can offer the display case and the loan. What it cannot do under the present law is change who owns the objects. That takes Parliament. And after two years of legislative changes that ultimately left the British Museum explicitly outside the new power to return objects, the law is clear: the museum cannot give the Benin Bronzes back on its own.